Sean Avery’s Innovation?
Monday, April 14th, 2008The following is an opinion piece.
When the Rangers stuck Sean Avery in front of Martin Brodeur on Sunday afternoon, they probably never imagined that he would go to such lengths to attempt to distract the New Jersey netminder. Yet there he was, waving and ranting and raving like a man possessed.
Avery played more like a basketball defender than a hockey player, facing Brodeur and waving his arms and stick around in an attempt to distract the goalie.
Brodeur reacted in expected fashion, trying to follow the puck and swat Avery away like a fly. Lots of skaters make their living in front of the net on the power play of course, like Tomas Holmstrom or Ryan Smyth, but nobody has quite taken the art of screening to the level that Avery did in Sunday’s game.
So was it innovation or was he breaking some sort of unwritten rule? Gary Bettman said he discussed the matter with Colin Campbell, the NHL’s senior vice president of hockey operations, on Sunday afternoon. “It’s something that we’re going to address, probably in the realm of either goaltender interference, or unsportsmanlike conduct. We’ll put the clubs on notice before we make that interpretation. But the ingenuity and creativity of things we’ve never seen before never ceases to amaze us. But we’ll deal with it,” he said.
Goaltender interference? Sounds a little suspect to me. I’m no Sean Avery fan, as my posts here document, but I’ll be the first to admit that calling what he did “goaltender interference” or “unsportsmanlike conduct” is a stretch. Avery had no contact with Brodeur, didn’t touch him, and didn’t touch anyone else. The only risk in the play was that Avery’s stick was up in the air. It seemed that Chris Drury actually skated into the play to tell him to put his stick down, too.
Avery can be ingratiating, annoying, and one hell of a pest. He’s also a ridiculously smart player that levels the foundation of “Canadian honour hockey” that can often be pathetic. His ability to get in the heads of his opponents (and sometimes his own teammates) shows just how different a player he is. But is he a bad player? No. He scored a goal moments after distracting Brodeur.
Teammates supported Avery. “Show me the rule book,” Brendan Shanahan said. “What’s the rule? If they’re going to change a rule in mid-season, they need a 30-0 vote of the Board of Governors.” Shanahan knows the rules, too.
Critics and reporters throughout Canada, like in the Globe and Mail, are suggesting that Avery needs to have the book thrown at him for his clownish antics. What? These are the same critics and reporters that suggest that fighting needs to be introduced even more into hockey and that the fisticuffs are a “normal way to solve disputes.”
Let me see if I’ve got this straight: Avery clowning around in front of the net and distracting Martin Brodeur by making himself look silly is bad for hockey, despite the notion that there was no contact and NO goalie interference to speak off. Full-on bumps and hits on the goalie are tolerated (ask Roberto Luongo after last year’s playoffs) and no calls are made. But somebody waves his arms around in front of the precious Brodeur and the league considers a penalty and an amendment to the rules? Are you kidding me?
Had it been almost any other player, the league would have ignored the incident and possibly even praised its innovation. But once it’s Sean Avery, look out. The entire foundation of hockey is being tossed asunder. Hold on to your hats, purists, Sean Avery’s on the ice.

